1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 115:
Line 115: + + +
→My two cents
Avoiding the philosophers here would be helpful, certainly. I really think that we need to leave out the current examples in your revision. I don't really want to do the editing personally because i hate edit wars, but I'd love to comment on it here, and post edits with consensus. Thanks --[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Avoiding the philosophers here would be helpful, certainly. I really think that we need to leave out the current examples in your revision. I don't really want to do the editing personally because i hate edit wars, but I'd love to comment on it here, and post edits with consensus. Thanks --[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Rog, any chance we can take out the text on Evo and just link to it to avoid politics and confusion?--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:08, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Rog, any chance we can take out the text on Evo and just link to it to avoid politics and confusion?--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:08, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
Ok, that last edit about the common understanding of theory is just wrong, but it IS a matter of opinion, so there is certainly room for disagreement. However, it is OPINION, and should have no place here. That is why I think we should dispense with the examples. There is no need to have our opinions compete here...it's the wrong forum for that.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:22, 29 March 2007 (EDT)