Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 80: Line 80:  
: Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing. If you accept the many premises as true, then the Christian teaching (at least as I understand it) follows logically. However, the premises themselves are not immune to questioning. I agree that this is not true formal logic. As I mentioned in the opening paragraphs, I'm using "logical" in the more colloquial sense of reasonable, sensible or persuasive. [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 19:58, 17 December 2009 (EST)
 
: Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing. If you accept the many premises as true, then the Christian teaching (at least as I understand it) follows logically. However, the premises themselves are not immune to questioning. I agree that this is not true formal logic. As I mentioned in the opening paragraphs, I'm using "logical" in the more colloquial sense of reasonable, sensible or persuasive. [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 19:58, 17 December 2009 (EST)
 
: Or, to rephrase my approach in a more properly logical manner, a conclusion can be said to be true if the premises preceding it are true '''and''' if the argument is valid. The argument appears to be sound, so instead I am questioning the premises. [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 20:04, 17 December 2009 (EST)
 
: Or, to rephrase my approach in a more properly logical manner, a conclusion can be said to be true if the premises preceding it are true '''and''' if the argument is valid. The argument appears to be sound, so instead I am questioning the premises. [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 20:04, 17 December 2009 (EST)
 +
::::Fair enough.  Allow me to extrapolate the argument from your essay you are using so that we can see what the premises are that you dispute.
 +
 +
''  1A God exists, who created the world and mankind,
 +
    2This God desires for mankind to dwell with Him in Heaven,
 +
    3This God dislikes some actions taken by man, and cannot allow men who have offended Him to enter Heaven,
 +
    4This God requires that retribution be made for these offenses,
 +
    5The only acceptable form of retribution is death,
 +
    6God refuses to forgive sins unless a blood sacrifice has been made.
 +
    7God sent His son down as a sacrifice
 +
    8This sacrifice remits all past present and future sins
 +
    9However in order to avail oneself of the sacrifice, one must have faith and belief in it ''
 +
 +
 +
''Therefore    Forgiveness is granted to those who believe that the sacrifice took place''
 +
 +
 +
I think we agree that this is a logical argument.  Please elaborate on which premise (1-8) you seek to deny.--[[User:PThomson|PThomson]] 20:13, 17 December 2009 (EST)
40

edits

Navigation menu