Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
193 bytes removed ,  17:43, December 18, 2009
deleted paragraph about "the best members," because this concept is about the best output, not the best "persons"
Line 3: Line 3:  
{{cquote|<big>'''The best of the public is better than a group of experts.'''</big>}}
 
{{cquote|<big>'''The best of the public is better than a group of experts.'''</big>}}
 
The concept then became a topic of discussion in the interview of ''Conservapedia'' on the Colbert Report on December 8, 2009.<ref>http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/258144/december-08-2009/andy-schlafly</ref>
 
The concept then became a topic of discussion in the interview of ''Conservapedia'' on the Colbert Report on December 8, 2009.<ref>http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/258144/december-08-2009/andy-schlafly</ref>
−
  −
It is important to note that this does not mean ''every'' member of the public is better than experts, but that ''certain'' members of the public - the best members - are better than experts.
      
Examples of approaches using the "best of the public" include:
 
Examples of approaches using the "best of the public" include:
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,644

edits

Navigation menu