Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
62 bytes added ,  23:20, December 18, 2009
m
hope ed doesn't mind, just clarifying a bit
Line 7: Line 7:     
Seducers and advocates alike employ the argument that same-sex relations cannot be labeled as homosexual unless one or both parties has a "[[homosexual orientation]]". It's an attempt to subvert the following argument:
 
Seducers and advocates alike employ the argument that same-sex relations cannot be labeled as homosexual unless one or both parties has a "[[homosexual orientation]]". It's an attempt to subvert the following argument:
#[[Sex]] between males is immoral
+
#[[Sex]] between members of the same gender is immoral
#We are males, and we are having sex
+
#We are the same gender, and we are having sex
 
#Therefore, what we are doing is immoral
 
#Therefore, what we are doing is immoral
    
Below, the denial consists in substituting the word ''homosexual'' or ''homosexuality'' in a misleading way:
 
Below, the denial consists in substituting the word ''homosexual'' or ''homosexuality'' in a misleading way:
#Homosexuality is sex between males having a [[homosexual orientation]].
+
#Homosexuality is sex between members of the same gender having a [[homosexual orientation]].
#We are males, and we are having sex
+
#We are the same gender, and we are having sex
 
#Society considers sexual contact between homosexuals immoral
 
#Society considers sexual contact between homosexuals immoral
 
#One or both of us is not "a homosexual"
 
#One or both of us is not "a homosexual"
 
No conclusion can be drawn from the premises.
 
No conclusion can be drawn from the premises.
3,552

edits

Navigation menu