There is a conservapedia commandment stating: "Everything you post must be true and verifiable."
There is a conservapedia commandment stating: "Everything you post must be true and verifiable."
−
I don't think this is enough. There are many articles at Conservapedia which do not have any sourcing via footnotes. I think this undercuts our credibility and helps encourage people to put mere opinion that is not sourced. I think over the long run if we are to compete with Wikipedia we must have sourcing. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:41, 29 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
+
I don't think this is enough. There are many articles at Conservapedia which do not have any sourcing via footnotes. I think this undercuts our credibility and helps encourage people to put mere opinion that is not sourced. I think over the long run if we are to compete with Wikipedia we must have sourcing. Sourcing should be a requirement and not merely implied.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:41, 29 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
: What counts as a reliable source? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 18:42, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
: What counts as a reliable source? --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 18:42, 29 March 2007 (EDT)