Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Essay: Logic and One View of Christianity (view source)

Revision as of 01:03, December 19, 2009

668 bytes added ,  01:03, December 19, 2009
Why you would choose this as a starting point for analyzing the logic of the Bible itself is inexplicable.
Line 61: Line 61:     
:::::: A fair point. But before we go any further off track, can you please explain where I am wrong in my summary (posted at 18:46)? I'd like to get that issue resolved before trying to build on it. [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 20:18, 17 December 2009 (EST)
 
:::::: A fair point. But before we go any further off track, can you please explain where I am wrong in my summary (posted at 18:46)? I'd like to get that issue resolved before trying to build on it. [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 20:18, 17 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
::::::: Your summary restates a theological metaphor for Jesus as a sacrificial lamb for our sins, which is consistent with the Jewish tradition at the time of making animal sacrifices.  Whether that particular metaphor should be translated the same way today, when animal sacrifices are non-existent, is an open question about which I hope you have an open mind.  The Gospels themselves rarely mention "lamb", and it was a metaphor used in letters to a Jewish audience in the first century.  Why you would choose this as your starting point for analyzing the logic of the Bible itself is inexplicable.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:03, 18 December 2009 (EST)
    
== problems witht the use of "Logic"  ==
 
== problems witht the use of "Logic"  ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,425

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/734853"

Navigation menu