Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,414
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 67:
Line 67: + +
→Climategate media coverage
:Excellent source! I hadn't seen this article yet, thanks for pointing it out. I'll likely get it added in the next wave of updates. Since the [[Mainstream media]] won't touch Climategate there needs to be ''somewhere'' on the Internet documenting the scandal in its entirety. The leftist media would love to sweep this under the rug and have it disappear. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 00:12, 16 December 2009 (EST)
:Excellent source! I hadn't seen this article yet, thanks for pointing it out. I'll likely get it added in the next wave of updates. Since the [[Mainstream media]] won't touch Climategate there needs to be ''somewhere'' on the Internet documenting the scandal in its entirety. The leftist media would love to sweep this under the rug and have it disappear. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 00:12, 16 December 2009 (EST)
:: Glad it helped. If you were perplexed (as i am sure you were) why WP seemed less than objective in its treatment of Climate Change (should that be capitialized?) then see here:[http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2009/12/19/lawrence-solomon-wikipedia-s-climate-doctor.aspx ''Lawrence Solomon: Wikipedia’s climate doctor'', December 19, 2009]
== Rush Limbaugh ==
== Rush Limbaugh ==