1,116
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + +
Talk:Homosexual denial (view source)
Revision as of 20:05, December 20, 2009
, 20:05, December 20, 2009no edit summary
I believe this article should be restructured or, as it appears now, deleted, simply on the grounds on the Conservapedia Commandments: "Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry. Opinions can be posted on Talk:pages or on debate or discussion pages." This article got many personal opinions, most notably "No conclusion can be drawn from the premises". The article is also against both "Everything you post must be true and verifiable" and "Always cite and give credit to your sources, even if in the public domain", as it got no sources/references/citations at all. [[User:Efloean|Efloean]] 14:10, 20 December 2009 (EST)
I believe this article should be restructured or, as it appears now, deleted, simply on the grounds on the Conservapedia Commandments: "Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry. Opinions can be posted on Talk:pages or on debate or discussion pages." This article got many personal opinions, most notably "No conclusion can be drawn from the premises". The article is also against both "Everything you post must be true and verifiable" and "Always cite and give credit to your sources, even if in the public domain", as it got no sources/references/citations at all. [[User:Efloean|Efloean]] 14:10, 20 December 2009 (EST)
:I do not think that this is a personal opinion. The logic, I think, is like this:
:*P1. A iff B and C
:*P2. B is true
:*P3. A = D
:*P4. Not A
:*C1. Not C
:(Hope the notation is right) Maybe it should be put in another article, or in an essay. But the logic is fine.--[[User:Wuhao1911|Wuhao1911]] 15:05, 20 December 2009 (EST)