Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 84:
Line 84: + +
Talk:Conservative Bible Project (view source)
Revision as of 00:24, December 22, 2009
, 00:24, December 22, 2009→Lost Gospels: Presenting the authentic material is not censorship, but honesty. No, we're not going to pretend that something fake is real.
Has there been any consideration to including lost Gospels in this project, for example, the Gospel of Mary, the Gospel of Thomas, or the Gospel of Judas? After all, wasn’t the selection of the Gospels we read today and the exclusion of others the first form of censorship or bias the bible received? I think it would be interesting to see what can be done with these other lost Gospels and how they can be integrated into a new, more complete version of the bible. --[[User:Smclean|Smclean]] 19:08, 21 December 2009 (EST)
Has there been any consideration to including lost Gospels in this project, for example, the Gospel of Mary, the Gospel of Thomas, or the Gospel of Judas? After all, wasn’t the selection of the Gospels we read today and the exclusion of others the first form of censorship or bias the bible received? I think it would be interesting to see what can be done with these other lost Gospels and how they can be integrated into a new, more complete version of the bible. --[[User:Smclean|Smclean]] 19:08, 21 December 2009 (EST)
:Presenting the authentic material is not censorship, but honesty. No, we're not going to pretend that something fake is real.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:24, 21 December 2009 (EST)