Automoderated users, edit
3,552
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: +
no edit summary
Or the resistance of [[climate change]] theorists to acknowledge the flaws in the [[hockey stick graph]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:36, 24 December 2009 (EST)
Or the resistance of [[climate change]] theorists to acknowledge the flaws in the [[hockey stick graph]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:36, 24 December 2009 (EST)
:I think the whole climategate scandal has exposed all the climate 'experts', but the question is whether this was down to error or deceit. [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 17:19, 24 December 2009 (EST)
:I think the whole climategate scandal has exposed all the climate 'experts', but the question is whether this was down to error or deceit. [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 17:19, 24 December 2009 (EST)
::I agree with TrondE that ClimateGate definitely belongs under deceit, not this page. But I'm definitely voting to include Ed's suggestions, I think they're great examples! [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 17:31, 24 December 2009 (EST)