798
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
no edit summary
The scientific theory on the origin of the universe isn't that it "erupted from nothing", but that a quantum singularity burst outwards because of an explosion created from the immense pressure and heat. I've changed the article, but the citation is still something that twists the idea into something it isn't. {{unsigned|Grapes}}
The scientific theory on the origin of the universe isn't that it "erupted from nothing", but that a quantum singularity burst outwards because of an explosion created from the immense pressure and heat. I've changed the article, but the citation is still something that twists the idea into something it isn't. {{unsigned|Grapes}}
: The citation is explaining the view of a Big Bang ''expert'', so can't be said to be "twisting" the idea. And a singularity is something that has no dimensions—i.e. it's synonymous with ''nothing''. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:24, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
: The citation is explaining the view of a Big Bang ''expert'', so can't be said to be "twisting" the idea. And a singularity is something that has no dimensions—i.e. it's synonymous with ''nothing''. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:24, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
Would it be alright to write a comprehensive section on the age of the universe from the mainstream secular science POV. The age of the universe is virtually non-existent except for the YEC point of view and it be good to have more balance. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 20:51, 25 December 2009 (EST)