1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 136:
Line 136: + +
→My two cents: You have made it incorrect. Scientists don't make that claim
:I also edited out "Evolutionists claim," for a lot of reasons. First, "evolutionists claim" is YEC weasel wording that is meaningless. The scientific usage of the term is defined by scientists, and it is defined as quoted below, end of story.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 19:37, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
:I also edited out "Evolutionists claim," for a lot of reasons. First, "evolutionists claim" is YEC weasel wording that is meaningless. The scientific usage of the term is defined by scientists, and it is defined as quoted below, end of story.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 19:37, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
:: You have made it incorrect. Scientists don't make that claim in a scientific context; only evolutionists do when promoting evolution. I have given references for it. Please dispute it on the Talk page before you make these changes. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:15, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
In re your last edit: theory is also used to describe systems of thought that are extinct. Ether theory is still ether theory, it just isn't considered a valid theory anymore. Difficult linguistic problem.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:48, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
In re your last edit: theory is also used to describe systems of thought that are extinct. Ether theory is still ether theory, it just isn't considered a valid theory anymore. Difficult linguistic problem.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:48, 29 March 2007 (EDT)