2,002
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 176:
Line 176: + Line 224:
Line 225: + +
→Abuse of sysop priviledge
There are a few protected pages, and probably with good reason, but this doesn't work if a sysop starts to enter factual errors, and opinion and slander into protected articles, and nobody cares to fix it. [[User:RobS| RobS]] first replaced extended a fairly brief and sketchy article on Hitler, and introduced irrelevant subsections, rumors and slander, and many factual errors. An article that was too brief, but a good start turned into one of the worst on Conservapedia. (If I have time this weekend I might start cleaning it, now that it's unlocked). Now RobS started to mess with the article on [[Liberals]]. It was a fairly stable version, fairly factual, even if written from a conservative viewpoint. But [[User:RobS|RobS]] now started to insert slander, about democrats supporting Saddam. This is just opening a can of worms about which side supported more fascistoid dictators. But it cannot be removed, because it is protected, and only [[User:RobS|RobS]] can edit. I would suggest to take his sysop rights away, because he repeatedly violate the standard that conservapedia wants to set, namely that articles should be factual, and free of gossip and slander. [[User:Order | Order]] 23 March 12:05 (AEST)
There are a few protected pages, and probably with good reason, but this doesn't work if a sysop starts to enter factual errors, and opinion and slander into protected articles, and nobody cares to fix it. [[User:RobS| RobS]] first replaced extended a fairly brief and sketchy article on Hitler, and introduced irrelevant subsections, rumors and slander, and many factual errors. An article that was too brief, but a good start turned into one of the worst on Conservapedia. (If I have time this weekend I might start cleaning it, now that it's unlocked). Now RobS started to mess with the article on [[Liberals]]. It was a fairly stable version, fairly factual, even if written from a conservative viewpoint. But [[User:RobS|RobS]] now started to insert slander, about democrats supporting Saddam. This is just opening a can of worms about which side supported more fascistoid dictators. But it cannot be removed, because it is protected, and only [[User:RobS|RobS]] can edit. I would suggest to take his sysop rights away, because he repeatedly violate the standard that conservapedia wants to set, namely that articles should be factual, and free of gossip and slander. [[User:Order | Order]] 23 March 12:05 (AEST)
*You refered to a citation [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&diff=47052&oldid=47024] to [[Lucy Dawidowicz]], [one of the most respected Holocaust historians of the past 50s years, as a "rant". [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Adolf_Hitler&diff=47096&oldid=47087] You did this presumably because you could not respond to her words, so you came here and posted garbage about me. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:06, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
*You refered to a citation [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&diff=47052&oldid=47024] to [[Lucy Dawidowicz]], [one of the most respected Holocaust historians of the past 50s years, as a "rant". [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Adolf_Hitler&diff=47096&oldid=47087] You did this presumably because you could not respond to her words, so you came here and posted garbage about me. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:06, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
::* I didn't call her words a rant, but the fact that you included her words to suggest that the gay victims do not actually matter. Not the point she wanted to make was the issue, but the point you wanted to make. [[User:Order]] 30 March, 10:15 AEST
I unlocked Hitler. I locked it. What is the problem with it now, Order? Better than posting here, you know darn well how to get hold of me. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 22:12, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
I unlocked Hitler. I locked it. What is the problem with it now, Order? Better than posting here, you know darn well how to get hold of me. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 22:12, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
::I just found this discussion; not to open a can of worms, but I challenge [[User:Order]] to find '''one''' singular factual error at Hitler, unless you wish to proceed with the understanding I thought was made on the Talk page. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:01, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::I just found this discussion; not to open a can of worms, but I challenge [[User:Order]] to find '''one''' singular factual error at Hitler, unless you wish to proceed with the understanding I thought was made on the Talk page. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:01, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
::: One that we already discussed was that more than 2 people survived the Beer Hall Putsch. But, I was mostly irrtiated by your obstructionist approach, even more so since you edited and reverted a protected article, without discussion. [[User:Order]] 30 March, 10:20 (AEST)
== New Users to watch ==
== New Users to watch ==