Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − +
Testability of intelligent design (view source)
Revision as of 18:59, December 28, 2009
, 18:59, December 28, 2009redo link
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA]]:
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]:
:It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a [[Intelligent Designer|designer]] is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is [[Darwinian evolution]]. The claim of the [[evolutionary biologists]] is that unintelligent causes did the whole job. If they can prove it, then the counter-hypothesis that you need intelligence has been tested, and it has been shown to be false. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html]
:It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a [[Intelligent Designer|designer]] is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is [[Darwinian evolution]]. The claim of the [[evolutionary biologists]] is that unintelligent causes did the whole job. If they can prove it, then the counter-hypothesis that you need intelligence has been tested, and it has been shown to be false. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html]