Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  22:18, December 30, 2009
no edit summary
Line 79: Line 79:  
:::::Raul Castro would not need to be popular if he was truly dedicated to being the next dictator as he is the leader of the armed forces. If he wished he could simply crush the opposition. That and gain massive sympathy through a propaganda campaign through his brothers death. Stalin did much the same thing with Lenin. He used the mans death to further his own gains. In fact Lenin's case was similar as he had suffered from a stroke that kept him from making public appearances. The USSR certainly had no incentive to lie about that.
 
:::::Raul Castro would not need to be popular if he was truly dedicated to being the next dictator as he is the leader of the armed forces. If he wished he could simply crush the opposition. That and gain massive sympathy through a propaganda campaign through his brothers death. Stalin did much the same thing with Lenin. He used the mans death to further his own gains. In fact Lenin's case was similar as he had suffered from a stroke that kept him from making public appearances. The USSR certainly had no incentive to lie about that.
   −
       Mr. Shlalfly your argument does not make much sense. You have not shown any incentive that there is to lie about his death. As I just explained above Raul would not need to lie as he has the absolute power in his country. Also please note that you are breaking Conservapedia commandement #5 by posting the opening of the article as "and is presumably no longer alive as of December 2009; the communists running Cuba have no incentive to risk challenge to their power by announcing that he passed away." This is a personal opinion and is not backed up by any source and is purely speculation. I am going to honor the Conservapedia Commandments and change the heading in order to reflect what is known and not speculation. I trust that since this is within the code of conduct it is appropriate?--[[User:Matthew2208|Matthew2208]] 17:17, 30 December 2009 (EST)
+
       Mr. Shlalfly your argument does not make much sense. You have not shown any incentive that there is to lie about his death. As I just explained above Raul would not need to lie as he has the absolute power in his country. Also please note that you are breaking Conservapedia commandement #5 by posting the opening of the article as -and is presumably no longer alive as of December 2009; the communists running Cuba have no incentive to risk challenge to their power by announcing that he passed away.- This is a personal opinion and is not backed up by any source and is purely speculation. I am going to honor the Conservapedia Commandments and change the heading in order to reflect what is known and not speculation. I trust that since this is within the code of conduct it is appropriate?--[[User:Matthew2208|Matthew2208]] 17:17, 30 December 2009 (EST)
52

edits

Navigation menu