Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
478 bytes added ,  01:44, March 30, 2007
You are getting way off-topic here
Line 15: Line 15:  
:::::: The anonymous comment is wrong on every count. QCD is renormalizable. Bible quotes about quarks would have no effect on the Discovery Institute. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:58, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::: The anonymous comment is wrong on every count. QCD is renormalizable. Bible quotes about quarks would have no effect on the Discovery Institute. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 12:58, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
   −
:::::::I misspoke (miswrote?).  QCD is renormalizable but the need for renormalization indicates that the theory has fundamental mathematical problems.  Read Feynman on this point, for example.  You might like the experimental support for quark models, but observational support for evolution is ten times stronger.  You insist on calling evolution "just a theory" but have no problem saying the quark model is a fact.  Are you seriously saying that the funders of the Discovery Institute are not motivated by religion?  Are you seriously saying that they are scientists who happen to have a different opinion about evolution?
+
:::::::I misspoke (miswrote?).  QCD is renormalizable but the need for renormalization indicates that the theory has fundamental mathematical problems.  Read Feynman on this point, for example.  You might like the experimental support for quark models, but observational support for evolution is ten times stronger.  You insist on calling evolution "just a theory" but have no problem saying the quark model is a fact.  Are you seriously saying that the funders of the Discovery Institute are not motivated by religion?  Are you seriously saying that they are scientists who happen to have a different opinion about evolution? -Lgm
 +
 
 +
:::::::: You are getting way off-topic here. I have no problem saying evolution is a fact. I don't know who funds the Discovery Institute, and I wouldn't try to read their minds anyway. I am not saying that those funders are scientists; they probably are not. They do seem to have a different opinion about evolution, but so what? They are entitled to their opinions. And none of this has anything to do with atoms. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 21:44, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Navigation menu