Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 52: Line 52:  
              
 
              
 
But none of these are counterexamples or "discontinuities":  they are just a misinterpretation of the formulas.  You don't get the momentum of a photon by taking the momentum formula for a mass and setting m=0 and v=c.  That's just not what the formula means, or what they are for.  This item should also be removed.--[[User:NgSmith|NgSmith]] Tue Dec 15 10:16:21 EST 2009
 
But none of these are counterexamples or "discontinuities":  they are just a misinterpretation of the formulas.  You don't get the momentum of a photon by taking the momentum formula for a mass and setting m=0 and v=c.  That's just not what the formula means, or what they are for.  This item should also be removed.--[[User:NgSmith|NgSmith]] Tue Dec 15 10:16:21 EST 2009
 +
 +
== Counterexample 9 (Jesus action-at-a-distance) ==
 +
 +
The quoted verse doesn't strongly suggest "action-at-a-distance" in the relativistic sense.  Light could travel the distances mentioned in the passage in a fraction of a second, which is well within the precision given in the verse (an hour).  The verse and relativity are not in contradiction here.  This should be removed.
2

edits

Navigation menu