Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
51 bytes added ,  15:31, January 5, 2010
m
Line 341: Line 341:  
:::Your suggestion is a dilution, in addition to being a circular definition.  Here we strive to be clear, direct and concise.  Also, there's nothing special or different about "American liberalism."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:58, 4 January 2010 (EST)
 
:::Your suggestion is a dilution, in addition to being a circular definition.  Here we strive to be clear, direct and concise.  Also, there's nothing special or different about "American liberalism."--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:58, 4 January 2010 (EST)
   −
::::I know it's circular; I know it's less specific.  What I'm trying to say is that there seems to be a disconnect between the definition, which seems to define [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09212a.htm theological liberalism]; and the rest of the article, which seems to talk about political liberalism.  You said above that the distinct thing about liberals is that they refuse to repent after sinning - well, I can name any number of medieval monarchs who refused to repent of adultery, tyranny, et cetera; while they were definitely theological liberals, they weren't political liberals in that they opposed virtually all of the liberal political positions you name!  So, the article's current definition lumps theological liberalism together with political liberalism.  If you want to talk about both concepts here, I'm certainly fine with that, but we'll have to expand the article.
+
::::I know it's circular; I know it's less specific.  What I'm trying to say is that there seems to be a disconnect between the definition, which seems to define [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09212a.htm theological liberalism]; and the rest of the article, which seems to talk about political liberalism.  You said above that the distinct thing about liberals is that they refuse to repent after sinning - well, I can name any number of medieval monarchs who refused to repent of adultery, tyranny, et cetera; while they were definitely theological liberals, they weren't political liberals in that they opposed virtually all of the liberal political positions you name!  So, the article's current definition lumps theological liberalism together with political liberalism.  If you want to talk about both concepts here, I'm certainly fine with that, but we'll have to expand the article. --[[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 10:31, 5 January 2010 (EST)
740

edits

Navigation menu