Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
intro: This was developed to demonstrate doubts about using the Axiom of Choice (an element of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory) in order to prove mathematical claims.
Line 1: Line 1:  
{{disputed}}
 
{{disputed}}
−
The '''Banach-Tarski paradox''' is that statement that a ball can be cut into 5 pieces, which can then be reassembled into two balls of equal volume.  It relies on the [[Axiom of Choice]].  It is called a paradox because it violates our physical intuition that this is impossible, though this paradox has been proven under [[Zermelo-Fraenkel]] set theory.
+
The '''Banach-Tarski paradox''' is that statement that a ball can be cut into 5 pieces, which can then be reassembled into two balls of equal volume.  It is called a paradox because it violates our physical intuition that this is impossible.  This was developed to demonstrate doubts about using the [[Axiom of Choice]] (an element of [[Zermelo-Fraenkel]] set theory) in order to prove mathematical claims.
    
Note that, since the pieces must be non-measurable, this cannot be done with an actual object.
 
Note that, since the pieces must be non-measurable, this cannot be done with an actual object.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,210

edits

Navigation menu