256
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 89:
Line 89: + + + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 12:27, January 6, 2010
, 12:27, January 6, 2010→Counterexample 9 (Jesus action-at-a-distance): bizarre
::Shall we look at it next? Joshua 10:11-14, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:18, 5 January 2010 (EST)
::Shall we look at it next? Joshua 10:11-14, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:18, 5 January 2010 (EST)
IMO, the discussion is a little bit bizarre: Following [[David Hume]]'s definition of a [[miracle]] as a "a violation of the laws of nature", for evaluating the ''laws of natures'', miracles can't be taken into account.
As I said earlier: we shouldn't try to restrict God with the laws of our logic - or even physics.
[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 07:27, 6 January 2010 (EST)