Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)

Revision as of 19:44, January 6, 2010

710 bytes added ,  19:44, January 6, 2010
two replies to Frank
Line 155: Line 155:     
::[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 12:02, 6 January 2010 (EST)
 
::[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 12:02, 6 January 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
:::Frank, I have an open mind about this, but I'm not aware of a single benefit from what you describe, nor do you identify one.  Do you have an open mind about this?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:44, 6 January 2010 (EST)
    
== GPS revisited ==
 
== GPS revisited ==
Line 169: Line 171:     
[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 13:13, 6 January 2010 (EST)
 
[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 13:13, 6 January 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
:Frank, your intuition ("seems to me") is wrong here, and the entry explains it clearly.  GPS is a work of engineering and any timing discrepancies between the satellite and ground are obviously better handled directly by synchronization rather than asking a physicist what he thinks of relativity.  Engineers don't even bother taking general relativity courses, let alone try to build a satellite system using them.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:44, 6 January 2010 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,329

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/742308"

Navigation menu