Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
25 bytes removed ,  22:09, January 6, 2010
trying to capture the precise flavor of weirdness
Line 1: Line 1:  
{{disputed}}
 
{{disputed}}
−
The '''Banach-Tarski paradox''' is that statement that a ball can be cut into 5 pieces, which can then be reassembled into two balls of equal volume.  It is called a paradox because it violates our physical intuition that this is impossible.  It is very similar to the [[Vitali set]], which was developed to illustrate possible flaws in using the [[Axiom of Choice]] (an element of [[Zermelo-Fraenkel]] set theory) in order to prove mathematical claims.  Since the Vitali set is less easily discussed with a layman, the Banach-Tarski paradox is often used to illustrate the "weirdness" of the Axiom of Choice.
+
The '''Banach-Tarski paradox''' is that statement that a sphere can be cut into 5 non-measurable pieces, which can then be reassembled into two spheres of equal volume; however, this cannot be done with an actual object.  It is called a paradox because it violates our physical intuition that this is impossible.  It is very similar to the [[Vitali set]], which was developed to illustrate possible flaws in using the [[Axiom of Choice]] (an element of [[Zermelo-Fraenkel]] set theory) in order to prove mathematical claims.  Since the Vitali set is less easily discussed with a layman, the Banach-Tarski paradox is often used to illustrate the "weirdness" of the Axiom of Choice.  
−
 
  −
Note that, since the pieces must be non-measurable, this cannot be done with an actual object.
      
==The Mathematics Behind It==
 
==The Mathematics Behind It==
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu