Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎The Mathematics Behind It: starting de-jargonization, but there's really very little jargon to begin with, this was taught to non-majors in just this way
Line 7: Line 7:  
===Theorem===
 
===Theorem===
   −
All sets discussed here are point sets in <math>\mathbb{R}^3 \ </math>.
+
All sets discussed here are point sets in three dimensional, flat (ie, normal, everyday) space.  A point set is just that - a set of points.
   −
A '''rigid motion''' of a set is a translation, rotation, or a composition of those two kinds of motion.  A rigid motion of a set <math>A \ </math> is often written <math>g(A) \ </math>.  
+
A '''rigid motion''' of a set is a movement of the whole set one one direction, or a rotation, or a composition of those two kinds of motion.  That is to say, the set doesn't bend or get broken up.  A rigid motion of a set <math>A \ </math> is often written <math>g(A) \ </math>.  
    
Let <math>A, B \ </math> be sets.  We say there is a '''rigid body equivalence''' <math>A \cong B \ </math> if <math>A \ </math> can be partitioned into finitely many sets <math>A_1, ..., A_n \ </math> and there are <math>n \ </math> rigid motions <math>g_1, ..., g_n \ </math> such that <math>g_1(A_1) \cup ... \cup g_n(A_n) = B \ </math>.
 
Let <math>A, B \ </math> be sets.  We say there is a '''rigid body equivalence''' <math>A \cong B \ </math> if <math>A \ </math> can be partitioned into finitely many sets <math>A_1, ..., A_n \ </math> and there are <math>n \ </math> rigid motions <math>g_1, ..., g_n \ </math> such that <math>g_1(A_1) \cup ... \cup g_n(A_n) = B \ </math>.
3,552

edits

Navigation menu