Automoderated users, edit
3,552
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + + + + + +
Talk:Banach-Tarski Paradox (view source)
Revision as of 22:29, January 6, 2010
, 22:29, January 6, 2010→Jargon: new section
Summary: Although the Banach-Tarski paradox quickly and easily demonstrates the strangeness of the AoC, and I have no problem including that, that wasn't the motivation for its development. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 22:44, 5 January 2010 (EST)
Summary: Although the Banach-Tarski paradox quickly and easily demonstrates the strangeness of the AoC, and I have no problem including that, that wasn't the motivation for its development. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 22:44, 5 January 2010 (EST)
== Jargon ==
I'm not quite sure where the jargon is - all the terms I used, I define in layman terms, and to be fair, the mathy sections are labelled "appropriate for college undergraduates," which is in keeping with the idea of introducing community college level home course material. In other words, I'm not expecting a 8th grader to understand this.
If those users who find this jargony could indicate where the problem first begins, I can take care of it. I feel if a reader reads the article, they'll understand it perfectly. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 17:29, 6 January 2010 (EST)