Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:  
[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 17:18, 13 January 2010 (EST)
 
[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 17:18, 13 January 2010 (EST)
 
:Don't revert Andy's edits unless there is a grammar or spelling error.  This has been discussed before, and a consensus has been reached.  The article reflects that consensus; don't change it. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 17:32, 13 January 2010 (EST)
 
:Don't revert Andy's edits unless there is a grammar or spelling error.  This has been discussed before, and a consensus has been reached.  The article reflects that consensus; don't change it. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 17:32, 13 January 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
::I read all  the discussions at talk pages on the [[theory of relativity]]. I'm not under the impression that a consensus was ever  reached, in fact, [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]]'s last contribution regarding some sections of the article states :
 +
:::''All of those statements are completely false. Relativity has no physical discontinuities, logic contradictions, or contradictions from evidence. Relativity promoters are no more liberal than those who promote quantum mechanics, superconductivity, or any other aspect of physics.''
 +
::(Perhaps you  haven't seen this, as it was a little bit prematurely archived)
 +
::Andy always claimed that engineers aren't interested in relativity, and that only physicists do bother. The GPS specification shows otherwise.
 +
::[[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 17:42, 13 January 2010 (EST)
256

edits

Navigation menu