| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Methodological naturalism''' is a strategy <ref>Roger Pennock declared that "science is not based upon a dogmatic [[ontological]] or [[metaphysical]] [[naturalism]], but rather makes use of naturalism only in a heuristic, [[methodological]] manner." [http://www.msu.edu/~pennock5/research/papers/Pennock_SupNatExpl.html] </ref> | + | '''Methodological naturalism''' is a strategy for studying the world, by which scientists choose not to consider [[supernatural]] causes - even as a remote possibility. There are two main reasons for pursuing this strategy. First, some scientists believe that there is no supernatural: they begin with the assumption that God does not exist (see [[atheism]]) and that there is no [[life after death]] (see also [[spiritual world]]). Second, some scientists believe it is possible that supernatural causes (such as [[God]] and [[angel]]s) may exist, but they assume that any supernatural action would be arbitrary or haphazard and therefore impossible to study systematically. |
| − | for studying the world, by which scientists choose not to consider [[supernatural]] causes - even as a remote possibility. There are two main reasons for pursuing this strategy. First, some scientists believe that there is no supernatural: they begin with the assumption that God does not exist (see [[atheism]]) and that there is no [[life after death]] (see also [[spiritual world]]). Second, some scientists believe it is possible that supernatural causes (such as [[God]] and [[angel]]s) may exist, but they assume that any supernatural action would be arbitrary or haphazard and therefore impossible to study systematically. | |
| | | | |
| | The first methodological naturalist is sometimes considered to have been [[Thales]]<ref>http://www.naturalism.org/history.htm</ref>, who explained earthquakes (which were traditionally attributed to the anger of the god [[Poseidon]]) with an early theory of [[Plate tectonics|plate tectonics]] | | The first methodological naturalist is sometimes considered to have been [[Thales]]<ref>http://www.naturalism.org/history.htm</ref>, who explained earthquakes (which were traditionally attributed to the anger of the god [[Poseidon]]) with an early theory of [[Plate tectonics|plate tectonics]] |
| | <ref>Padamsee, Hasan. Unifying the Universe: the Physics of Heaven and Earth. CRC Press, 2003. Page 15.</ref>. | | <ref>Padamsee, Hasan. Unifying the Universe: the Physics of Heaven and Earth. CRC Press, 2003. Page 15.</ref>. |
| | + | |
| | + | Roger Pennock declared that "science is not based upon a dogmatic [[ontological]] or [[metaphysical]] [[naturalism]], but rather makes use of naturalism only in a heuristic, [[methodological]] manner."<ref> [http://www.msu.edu/~pennock5/research/papers/Pennock_SupNatExpl.html] </ref> |
| | | | |
| | According to [[Christian]] [[Philosophy|philosopher]] [[Alvin Plantinga]], "The philosophical doctrine of methodological naturalism holds that, for any study of the world to qualify as "scientific," it cannot refer to God's creative activity (or any sort of divine activity)." <ref>http://www.arn.org/docs/odesign/od181/methnat181.htm</ref> | | According to [[Christian]] [[Philosophy|philosopher]] [[Alvin Plantinga]], "The philosophical doctrine of methodological naturalism holds that, for any study of the world to qualify as "scientific," it cannot refer to God's creative activity (or any sort of divine activity)." <ref>http://www.arn.org/docs/odesign/od181/methnat181.htm</ref> |