97
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − − No! − − If ID, or creationism should be tought at school, keep it out of science classes. − − Why? − − Because neither of themhave any scientific merrit. It's a poor attempt to use some scientific method to fit their perception of the world into biblical context. If Creationism should be tought at school well, then ALL creationist ideas should be tought at school. not only christian Creationism, but hinduism, Shamanism, Asatru Creationism, Aborigini creationism, and shyamanism. − − Creationism is nothing more than a prolonged arm of a religious agenda. − − Want fair and balanced knowledge? − − Let the students learn about all religions in school. but keep it ou of bioogy classes, or anything that remotelly resembles science. Because science it is not. − − Thanks − − Bohemianwriter1 − − Line 546:
Line 526: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools? (view source)
Revision as of 16:01, January 15, 2010
, 16:01, January 15, 2010moving Bohemianwriter1's comment to an appropriate section
{{debate-politics}}
{{debate-politics}}
==='''Teach Science As Science And Philosophy As Philosophy'''===
==='''Teach Science As Science And Philosophy As Philosophy'''===
:: Note also that the main creationist groups do not support teachers being forced to teach creation and ID, although they do support teachers being ''allowed'' to teach it.
:: Note also that the main creationist groups do not support teachers being forced to teach creation and ID, although they do support teachers being ''allowed'' to teach it.
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:41, 12 February 2009 (EST)
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:41, 12 February 2009 (EST)
==No!==
If ID, or creationism should be tought at school, keep it out of science classes.
Why?
Because neither of themhave any scientific merrit. It's a poor attempt to use some scientific method to fit their perception of the world into biblical context. If Creationism should be tought at school well, then ALL creationist ideas should be tought at school. not only christian Creationism, but hinduism, Shamanism, Asatru Creationism, Aborigini creationism, and shyamanism.
Creationism is nothing more than a prolonged arm of a religious agenda.
Want fair and balanced knowledge?
Let the students learn about all religions in school. but keep it ou of bioogy classes, or anything that remotelly resembles science. Because science it is not.
Thanks
Bohemianwriter1 {{unsigned|Bohemianwriter1}}