nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + +
Talk:Tea Party Movement (view source)
Revision as of 01:56, January 16, 2010
, 01:56, January 16, 2010→"An under-organized, underfunded amateurs' movement with obscure leadership."
:::good solution--thanks! [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:38, 15 January 2010 (EST)
:::good solution--thanks! [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:38, 15 January 2010 (EST)
::::If anyone has a problem they need to take it to the talk page first. And name-calling a senior administrator a liberal is beyond the bounds of propriety here. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 19:22, 15 January 2010 (EST)
::::If anyone has a problem they need to take it to the talk page first. And name-calling a senior administrator a liberal is beyond the bounds of propriety here. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 19:22, 15 January 2010 (EST)
*My job here, Dr. Jensen, isn't one of talking it out, arguing on talk pages. My job here is maintaining conservative orthodoxy, no matter who makes the changes, be it you, Ed Poor or anyone else. I use Ed's name because he is a dear and valued friend who I have also occasionally disagreed with, just like you Doc. Given the vast number of your edits and valuable contributions, my disagreements have been very few and far between, I hope you will agree. However some of my own thoughts are "liberal", as are your own, and I strive to keep those out of this project, as you should. Anything further, you are more than welcome to contact me directly, as always. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:56, 15 January 2010 (EST)