Changes

'''Ableman v. Booth''',  21 Howard 506 (1859), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold [[abolitionist]] Sherman M. Booth's conviction for assisting in the rescue of a fugitive slave at Milwaukee.  A judge of the Wisconsin Supreme Court had released him on a writ of habeas corpus, saying that the [[Fugitive Slave Act]] was unconstitutional. The case was carried to the U.S. Supreme Court, where Chief Justice [[Roger B. Taney]] rendered a unanimous opinion pronouncing the Fugitive Slave Act valid and forbidding a state to interfere with federal prisoners by habeas corpus writs.

'''''Ableman v. Booth''''',  21 Howard 506 (1859), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold [[abolitionist]] Sherman M. Booth's conviction for assisting in the rescue of a fugitive slave at Milwaukee.  A judge of the Wisconsin Supreme Court had released him on a writ of habeas corpus, saying that the [[Fugitive Slave Act]] was unconstitutional. The case was carried to the U.S. Supreme Court, where Chief Justice [[Roger B. Taney]] rendered a unanimous opinion pronouncing the Fugitive Slave Act valid and forbidding a state to interfere with federal prisoners by habeas corpus writs.

While this decision effectively nullified laws such as the [[Massachusetts Personal Liberty Act]], it was largely ignored in the North.  The next year, the South was still protesting that fugitive slaves were not being returned <ref>[http://www.google.com/books?id=CJQk9Ax6fZAC Official proceedings of the Democratic National Convention, 1860]</ref>.

While this decision effectively nullified laws such as the [[Massachusetts Personal Liberty Act]], it was largely ignored in the North.  The next year, the South was still protesting that fugitive slaves were not being returned <ref>[http://www.google.com/books?id=CJQk9Ax6fZAC Official proceedings of the Democratic National Convention, 1860]</ref>.