200
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: +
no edit summary
::Couldn't the article have the standard scientific meaning of ''animal'', and then state that "colloquially, however, 'animal' is usually taken to mean any non-human animal...etc"? [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 18:37, 16 January 2010 (EST)
::Couldn't the article have the standard scientific meaning of ''animal'', and then state that "colloquially, however, 'animal' is usually taken to mean any non-human animal...etc"? [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 18:37, 16 January 2010 (EST)
::Or, you could have it the other way around, put the Biblical definitions first, and then add that the scientific definition of ''animal'' is any multicellular (etc, etc...), including humans. [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 18:45, 16 January 2010 (EST)