Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
981 bytes added ,  02:31, January 17, 2010
attacking the prejudice of "scientific standards"
Line 13: Line 13:     
The simplest eumetazons are the Radiata, a loose group that includes jellyfish, corals, and comb jellies.  Most of them belong in the phylum Cnidaria, except for the comb jellies, which comprise the phylum Ctenophora.  Radiatans have what is called radial symmetry, where they can be divided into two even halves in many planes, like a wheel or a circle.  All cnidarians have special cells called cnidocytes, which produce the sting.  Comb jellies have no such cells and are harmless to humans.
 
The simplest eumetazons are the Radiata, a loose group that includes jellyfish, corals, and comb jellies.  Most of them belong in the phylum Cnidaria, except for the comb jellies, which comprise the phylum Ctenophora.  Radiatans have what is called radial symmetry, where they can be divided into two even halves in many planes, like a wheel or a circle.  All cnidarians have special cells called cnidocytes, which produce the sting.  Comb jellies have no such cells and are harmless to humans.
 +
 +
==Animals and people==
 +
 +
As [[God]] created man in His image, it is of primary importance to distinguish the characteristics of people from animals, such as the eternal spirit, the right to "take dominion" over the natural world of animals and plants, and the prospect of enjoying [[eternal life]]. Liberals say that these things are of secondary importance and insist that humans are merely apes.
 +
 +
For biologists who regard their field of study as belonging to [[physical science]], issues of [[psychology]] and spirituality take a back seat. They emphasize the physical similarities between the [[human body]] and the bodies of other creatures, classifying humans as [[mammal]]s, specifically, [[primate]]s.
 +
 +
Perhaps it is their [[methodological naturalism]] that leads them to ignore major qualitative differences and to speculate that humans are merely animals with somewhat greater intellectual ability. This vision may be more a predisposition than a scientific conclusion.
    
==Biblical origin of animals==
 
==Biblical origin of animals==
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu