Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
123 bytes removed ,  12:14, January 20, 2010
updated
Line 1: Line 1:  
[[Image:Capital.jpg|thumb|right|400px|The United States Capitol in Washington, D. C.]] In the '''2010 Midterm Elections,''' the nation will elect the 112th Congress, including all members of the House and one third of the Senate, together with a majority of governorships and many state and local offices.
 
[[Image:Capital.jpg|thumb|right|400px|The United States Capitol in Washington, D. C.]] In the '''2010 Midterm Elections,''' the nation will elect the 112th Congress, including all members of the House and one third of the Senate, together with a majority of governorships and many state and local offices.
   −
After the [[Democratic Party]] successes in the 2006 off-year election (when they recaptured Congress), augmented by more gains in the [[United States Presidential Election, 2008|Presidential Election of 2008]], the question is whether the Democrats will hold their gains or slip back.  Since the Democrats have an advantage of 257-178 in the House, the GOP must gain 40 seats to recapture control. Since the Democrats control the Senate 60-40 (counting the two independents), the GOP needs to gain 11 seats in the Senate to retake control<ref>A 50-50 tie would be broken by the vice president in favor of the Democrats.</ref>; but even a one-seat gain would allow the GOP to filibuster obnoxious bills, for 60 votes are needed to break a filibuster.
+
After the [[Democratic Party]] successes in the 2006 off-year election (when they recaptured Congress), augmented by more gains in the [[United States Presidential Election, 2008|Presidential Election of 2008]], the question is whether the Democrats will hold their gains or slip back.  Since the Democrats have an advantage of 257-178 in the House, the GOP must gain 40 seats to recapture control. Since the Democrats control the Senate 59-41 (counting the two independents), the GOP needs to gain 10 seats in the Senate to retake control<ref>A 50-50 tie would be broken by the vice president in favor of the Democrats.</ref>;
 
===Fund raising===
 
===Fund raising===
 
Although Democratic fund raising is significantly lower than the 2007-2008 election cycle <ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/24/AR2009092404906.html?hpid=topnews</ref>, they have still gotten off to a faster start than Republicans. By January 2010 Democratic candidates and party committees had raised a total of $396.5 million for the midterms, with $50 million on hand and $10 million debts.  Republicans had raised just $204.7 million, with about $30 million on hand and about $6 million in debts.  For the House elections Democratic candidates had raised $151 million and Republicans $109 million.  In the Senate  elections Democratic candidates had raised $98 million and Republicans $67 million.<ref> for latest updates see [http://www.opensecrets.org/ OpenSecrets.org]</ref>
 
Although Democratic fund raising is significantly lower than the 2007-2008 election cycle <ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/24/AR2009092404906.html?hpid=topnews</ref>, they have still gotten off to a faster start than Republicans. By January 2010 Democratic candidates and party committees had raised a total of $396.5 million for the midterms, with $50 million on hand and $10 million debts.  Republicans had raised just $204.7 million, with about $30 million on hand and about $6 million in debts.  For the House elections Democratic candidates had raised $151 million and Republicans $109 million.  In the Senate  elections Democratic candidates had raised $98 million and Republicans $67 million.<ref> for latest updates see [http://www.opensecrets.org/ OpenSecrets.org]</ref>
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
901

edits

Navigation menu