Changes

::::Yes, but that is what the common use of the term, "supply side" is -- government actions to increase aggregate output. The classic Keynesian model is for government to increase debt and spending to stimulate demand; supply siders increase private incentives to stimulate aggregate output.  Your use of the term, applying it to the supply of labor is, shall we say, "a novel interpretation," and would be considered Original Research under Wikipedia's editorial policies.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:09, 20 January 2010 (EST)

::::Yes, but that is what the common use of the term, "supply side" is -- government actions to increase aggregate output. The classic Keynesian model is for government to increase debt and spending to stimulate demand; supply siders increase private incentives to stimulate aggregate output.  Your use of the term, applying it to the supply of labor is, shall we say, "a novel interpretation," and would be considered Original Research under Wikipedia's editorial policies.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 21:09, 20 January 2010 (EST)

:::::Wikipedia has done a good job of suppressing originality. All scholars of all persuasions have long agreed that the New Deal rejected growth as a solution to economic problems. Conservatives rejected no-growth that at the time [eg Terborgh, ''The Bogey of Economic Maturity'' (1943)] and since 1960 or so liberals have also rejected no-growth policies. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 21:49, 20 January 2010 (EST)

:::::Wikipedia has done a good job of suppressing originality. All scholars of all persuasions have long agreed that the New Deal rejected growth as a solution to economic problems. Conservatives rejected no-growth that at the time [eg Terborgh, ''The Bogey of Economic Maturity'' (1943)] and since 1960 or so liberals have also rejected no-growth policies. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 21:49, 20 January 2010 (EST)

::::::Thank you. The text before footnote 25 reads, "The problem with the

::::::Thank you. The text before footnote 25 reads, "The problem with the supply-side remedies was that they cut output..."  Would you agree that use of the term "supply-side" here is unorthodox, or novel, given that in 1989, supply side generally referred to incentives, not the labor pool.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:45, 21 January 2010 (EST)

supply-side remedies was that they cut output..."  Would you agree that use of the term "supply-side" here is unorthodox, or novel, given that in 1989, supply side generally referred to incentives, not the labor pool.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:45, 21 January 2010 (EST)