798
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 86:
Line 86: + + + +
→(extra section break inserted to help things out)
:::I wish I could copy that, but the license isn't compatible with CP. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:32, 25 January 2010 (EST)
:::I wish I could copy that, but the license isn't compatible with CP. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:32, 25 January 2010 (EST)
:Well we have to remember, this is an article about the kingdom Animalia, as such it should be mentioned as far as humans go, that we are in both biologic and taxonomic classifications, animals. Any deeper notions about humanity, specifically religious, social, anthropological, psychological aspects, and so forth, should be covered instead in brief in the general article about humans and in detail in articles about humans and that specific subject.
:We are but a tiny part of the animal kingdom and in a general animal article, the mentioning about our inclusion should be brief and to the point, with internal links to articles about humans for further references and information in regards our species. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 12:35, 26 January 2010 (EST)