768
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + +
Talk:MIT OpenCourseWare (view source)
Revision as of 21:12, January 31, 2010
, 21:12, January 31, 2010→"only mentions it in a narrow, understated manner...": new section
[http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Economics/14-01Fall-2007/A7F7B0B1-DDAB-42BD-AA69-747196E1DAD4/0/14_01_lec34.pdf Lecture 18]. In fact, it would appear as if no theorists, regardless of ideological stripe, are mentioned in the syllabus--the syllabus only lays out the broad-strokes version of the concepts that each lecture addresses, not the way in which those ideas will be presented or thought about. [[User:AlexWD|AlexWD]] 11:15, 31 January 2010 (EST)
[http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Economics/14-01Fall-2007/A7F7B0B1-DDAB-42BD-AA69-747196E1DAD4/0/14_01_lec34.pdf Lecture 18]. In fact, it would appear as if no theorists, regardless of ideological stripe, are mentioned in the syllabus--the syllabus only lays out the broad-strokes version of the concepts that each lecture addresses, not the way in which those ideas will be presented or thought about. [[User:AlexWD|AlexWD]] 11:15, 31 January 2010 (EST)
== "only mentions it in a narrow, understated manner..." ==
Andy--have you read the whole set of notes? EVERYTHING pretty much gets mentioned in a "a narrow, understated manner." The notes are very obviously outlines, and not transcripts of a lecture--moreover, this is obviously an introductory/survey-level course where the goal is quite obviously to introduce studnets to the broad ideas--not to give an in-depth analysis of any one economic idea. [[User:AlexWD|AlexWD]] 16:12, 31 January 2010 (EST)