Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − + Line 11:
Line 11: − + − + − |- − |Romans 9:10-11 − |"... but when Rebecca also had '''''conceived''''' by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the '''''children being not yet born''''', neither having done any good or evil ...." − |"... when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad ..." − |"... Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad ...." Line 50:
Line 45: − + − + − + − + Line 59:
Line 54: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Line 67:
Line 80: − The NIV uses the word "womb" only 57 times, compared with 70 times by the [[NASB]] and 82 times by the [[ESV]]. Revisions to the NIV further promote feminist distortions.<ref>[http://www.tbaptist.com/aab/nivfembible.htm The Feminist NIV]</ref> The translating committee for the new version of the [[NIV]] lacks any self-described "complementarians" who support the differences between men and women, for example.<ref>"Moo declined to label any of the committee members as "complementarians' ...."[http://www.abpnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4357&Itemid=53 New NIV translation due out in 2011]</ref>+
rearrange for clarity of presentation
The '''Feminist Bible''' refers to translations of the [[Bible]] that kow-tow to [[feminist]] ideology. These translations also distort the original text itself, not for purposes of clarity (as claimed) but for purposes of the anti-Christian [[feminist]] agenda. Nearly all modern translations have been distorted by the feminist ideology to some extent, but some are affected more than others.
The '''Feminist Bible''' refers to translations of the [[Bible]] that kow-tow to [[feminist]] ideology. These translations also distort the original text itself, not for purposes of clarity (as claimed) but for purposes of the anti-Christian [[feminist]] agenda. Nearly all modern translations have been distorted by the feminist ideology to some extent, but some are affected more than others.
The often-promoted [[NIV]] is an example of a Feminist Bible. Here are numerous examples of the NIV purging references to the unborn child, and also imposing other feminist distortions.
The often-promoted [[NIV]] is an example of a Feminist Bible. Here are numerous examples of the NIV purging references to the unborn child:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
|Ruth 1:11
|Ruth 1:11
|"... are there yet any more sons in my womb, that they may be your husbands?"
|"... are there yet any more '''''sons in my womb''''', that they may be your husbands?"
|"... Have I yet sons in my womb, that they may be your husbands?"
|"... Have I yet '''''sons in my womb''''', that they may be your husbands?"
|"... Am I going to have any more sons, who could become your husbands?"
|"... Am I going to have any more sons, who could become your husbands?"
|-
|-
|Luke 1:15
|Luke 1:15
|"... Among them will be the blind and the lame, expectant mothers and women in labor ...."
|"... Among them will be the blind and the lame, expectant mothers and women in labor ...."
|-
|-
|1 John 3:1
|Romans 9:10-11
|Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God ....
|"... but when Rebecca also had '''''conceived''''' by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the '''''children being not yet born''''', neither having done any good or evil ...."
|See how great a love the Father has bestowed on us, that we would be called children of God ....
|"... when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad ..."
|How great is the love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! ....
|"... Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad ...."
|-
|-
|Psalm 78:6
|Psalm 78:6
|"so the next generation would know them, even the children yet to be born, and they in turn would tell their children."
|"so the next generation would know them, even the children yet to be born, and they in turn would tell their children."
|"so the next generation would know them, even the '''''children yet to be born''''' ..."
|"so the next generation would know them, even the '''''children yet to be born''''' ..."
|-
|}
The NIV uses the word "womb" only 57 times, compared with 70 times by the [[NASB]] and 82 times by the [[ESV]], which is a modern translation widely respected for its accuracy.
Other examples of feminist distortions in the NIV include the following:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!Verse
![[KJV]]
![[NASB]]
![[NIV]]
|-
|1 John 3:1
|Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God ....
|See how great a love the Father has bestowed on us, that we would be called children of God ....
|How great is the love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! ....
|-
|-
|Luke 5:20
|Luke 5:20
|}
|}
Revisions to the NIV further promote feminist distortions.<ref>[http://www.tbaptist.com/aab/nivfembible.htm The Feminist NIV]</ref> The translating committee for the new version of the [[NIV]] lacks any self-described "complementarians" who support the differences between men and women, for example.<ref>"Moo declined to label any of the committee members as "complementarians' ...."[http://www.abpnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4357&Itemid=53 New NIV translation due out in 2011]</ref>
== Other Examples ==
== Other Examples ==