70
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + + +
User talk:NathanBickel (view source)
Revision as of 03:03, February 3, 2010
, 03:03, February 3, 2010no edit summary
While I see that you wish to contribute constructively, this is the second time you've written an article in a non-encyclopedic style. We try to describe things factually and honestly, not with poetic language like "unrestrained seedling plant that eventually grows to its malevolent maturity." Pick up Britannica, and read some articles, or read articles here, and then read your latest contributions. Do you see the difference? [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:52, 2 February 2010 (EST)
While I see that you wish to contribute constructively, this is the second time you've written an article in a non-encyclopedic style. We try to describe things factually and honestly, not with poetic language like "unrestrained seedling plant that eventually grows to its malevolent maturity." Pick up Britannica, and read some articles, or read articles here, and then read your latest contributions. Do you see the difference? [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:52, 2 February 2010 (EST)
Jacob B: Thank you for your comments. I would hope that you and others would allow me to alter the part that you reference. I am very new to Conservapedia and have made a breakthrough tonight in learning how to do somemore formatting. I'll edit the part that needs to be more definitive and less poetic. Thanks again...........By the way......what is your email? I went to your page and could not find it. Thank you for your Conservapedia participation, as this is a great sight for patriotic, godly and conservative people!