798
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
no edit summary
Any statements which are not factual, but instead advances an agenda, ought to either be removed entirely or put in a seperate section labelled "Evolutionist Beliefs" or something. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 15:48, 2 February 2010 (EST)
Any statements which are not factual, but instead advances an agenda, ought to either be removed entirely or put in a seperate section labelled "Evolutionist Beliefs" or something. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 15:48, 2 February 2010 (EST)
:There is no attempt to advance an agenda other then to supply the best information found according to current theories in astrophysics on what metallicty is and how it may be used in measuring age. We don't do this for an agenda, we do this because we want to understand the universe which fascinates us so. If you want to add some sort of YEC section like was done for the Milky Way as a equable solution, I am fine with that. Just a FYI, evolutionist isn't an applicable word for work in astrophysics, we are dealing with ages and Deep Time far longer then those biologists use in calculating time scales for evolution. Also feel free to contact me on AIM. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 10:58, 3 February 2010 (EST)