1,237
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 79:
Line 79: +
→Students bearing arms: perfect, DMorris.
:The zero-tolerance rules ''are'' ridiculous, as evidenced by students being drug out in handcuffs for doodling on a desk, being suspended because of a harmless shotgun shell, etc. I just didn't want the article to read like Conservapedia advocated students bringing handguns into school. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 11:05, 7 February 2010 (EST)
:The zero-tolerance rules ''are'' ridiculous, as evidenced by students being drug out in handcuffs for doodling on a desk, being suspended because of a harmless shotgun shell, etc. I just didn't want the article to read like Conservapedia advocated students bringing handguns into school. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 11:05, 7 February 2010 (EST)
::Fair enough. Perhaps a better way of putting it would be ''zero-tolerence policies leave students and staff defenseless and restrict their right to property''? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 12:41, 7 February 2010 (EST)
::Fair enough. Perhaps a better way of putting it would be ''zero-tolerence policies leave students and staff defenseless and restrict their right to property''? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 12:41, 7 February 2010 (EST)
:::That's perfect, actually! I'll replace it right now if you haven't already. -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 13:11, 7 February 2010 (EST)