15
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: +
no edit summary
:: I don't think I will work on it more, I don't have a hope for it anymore to have something like this be published on conservapedia.--[[User:Syamsu|Syamsu]] 09:51, 9 February 2010 (EST)
:: I don't think I will work on it more, I don't have a hope for it anymore to have something like this be published on conservapedia.--[[User:Syamsu|Syamsu]] 09:51, 9 February 2010 (EST)
:::Sorry to hear that - will you still be contributing to other articles?--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:27, 9 February 2010 (EST)
:::Sorry to hear that - will you still be contributing to other articles?--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:27, 9 February 2010 (EST)
:::: No freedom is the main thing for me. Conservapedia is still much better on free will than wikipedia, in that in wikipedia free will is mainly presented as being a problem, and that it is impossible! But still conservapedia is weak in it's support for knowledge about freedom, compared to the self-evident matter of fact kind of certainty most people have in daily life that freedom is real.