798
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 113:
Line 113: + +
→(extra section break inserted to help things out)
::The essence of [[liberal deceit]] is often to pretend that there is no controversy. Wikipedia doesn't even have an article on [[scientific debate]]. Last time I checked, it had only a redirect to [[scientific rhetoric]]. Liberals refuse to acknowledged that real scientists can have genuine disagreements, and that it can take decades or centuries to resolve issues. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:16, 3 February 2010 (EST)
::The essence of [[liberal deceit]] is often to pretend that there is no controversy. Wikipedia doesn't even have an article on [[scientific debate]]. Last time I checked, it had only a redirect to [[scientific rhetoric]]. Liberals refuse to acknowledged that real scientists can have genuine disagreements, and that it can take decades or centuries to resolve issues. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:16, 3 February 2010 (EST)
::: I see the problem here, you believe that in biology and taxonomy, by classifying homo sapiens (humans) as part of the animal kingdom (Animalia) that it somehow commenting on the metaphysical and supernatural, that it is inferring that humans have no souls or spirits. That is not true, we are classified as such because of our biological traits, biology as a science does not attempt to answer questions of souls or spirits, because that is outside the scope of biology (and taxonomy). It isn't considered because there is no scientific way to prove or disprove something as "a soul". Biologically we are animals because we share all the basic traits that defines an animal, really that is what this article is about. --[[User:BMcP|BMcP]] 10:44, 10 February 2010 (EST)