Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
512 bytes added ,  15:32, February 11, 2010
Line 32: Line 32:     
::The radial velocity of the Andromeda galaxy with respect to the Milky Way can be measured by examining the Doppler shift of spectral lines from stars in the galaxy.  Using this the Andromeda Galaxy is approaching the Sun at about 100 to 140 kilometers per second.[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy/galaxy_collides_020507-1.html]  We can then estimate how long it would be before the galaxies meet up using math.  That is how we get the estimate of 2.5 billion or so years.  I will however concede that the collision is uncertain because the two galaxies may move past each other instead because we cannot exactly measure Andromeda's transverse velocity.  Because of that, I will change the text about the galaxies colliding to being uncertain.  Is this acceptable?
 
::The radial velocity of the Andromeda galaxy with respect to the Milky Way can be measured by examining the Doppler shift of spectral lines from stars in the galaxy.  Using this the Andromeda Galaxy is approaching the Sun at about 100 to 140 kilometers per second.[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy/galaxy_collides_020507-1.html]  We can then estimate how long it would be before the galaxies meet up using math.  That is how we get the estimate of 2.5 billion or so years.  I will however concede that the collision is uncertain because the two galaxies may move past each other instead because we cannot exactly measure Andromeda's transverse velocity.  Because of that, I will change the text about the galaxies colliding to being uncertain.  Is this acceptable?
 +
 +
:::The claim is completely unverifiable.  It's absurd even to contemplate whether the universe would exist so far into the future, not to mention the assumptions you're making about physical constants.
 +
 +
:::BMcP, I'm not going to spend all day urging you again and again to open your mind and confront the liberal assumptions.  Open your mind or go edit on another site.  Atheistic Wikipedia might welcome the unverified, pro-liberal junk science.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:32, 11 February 2010 (EST)
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu