Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Andromeda galaxy (view source)

Revision as of 22:28, February 11, 2010

636 bytes added ,  22:28, February 11, 2010
→‎Stop.. wait: I'm fine with including historical facts about opinions of scientists and others
Line 43: Line 43:     
::::: I think that some interesting facts have been deleted. There was a big public debate about some of these issues in 1920. It was resolved a few years later. If you want open-mindedness, then why don't you include the arguments of the losing side of that 1920 debate? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:20, 11 February 2010 (EST)
 
::::: I think that some interesting facts have been deleted. There was a big public debate about some of these issues in 1920. It was resolved a few years later. If you want open-mindedness, then why don't you include the arguments of the losing side of that 1920 debate? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:20, 11 February 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::: I'm fine with including historical facts about opinions of scientists and others.  For example, an entry could say that it was the consensus of scientists in the 1970s that the world was becoming dangerously over-populated to the extent that mass starvation was likely (the widely taught [[population bomb]]), or that that until the 1990s it was the consensus of scientists that life existed in outer space, justifying the expenditure of billions of taxpayer dollars to find it.  But science is plainly not resolved by consensus, as those two examples illustrate.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:28, 11 February 2010 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,622

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/753610"

Navigation menu