Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Andromeda galaxy (view source)

Revision as of 00:42, February 12, 2010

296 bytes added ,  00:42, February 12, 2010
My statement could not be any clearer: it isn't science to talk about billions of years into the future. It's atheism disguised as science.
Line 51: Line 51:     
:::::::: The distance and relative velocity of Andromeda is based on scientific observations. Nobody said that it would collide with the Earth, but it is headed for a collision with the Milky Way. Are you saying that these distance and velocity estimates are wrong? If so, what is your basis? Is Andromeda inconsistent with a belief in God and Bible? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:28, 11 February 2010 (EST)
 
:::::::: The distance and relative velocity of Andromeda is based on scientific observations. Nobody said that it would collide with the Earth, but it is headed for a collision with the Milky Way. Are you saying that these distance and velocity estimates are wrong? If so, what is your basis? Is Andromeda inconsistent with a belief in God and Bible? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:28, 11 February 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
::::::::: My statement could not be any clearer:  it isn't science to talk about billions of years into the future.  It's atheism disguised as science.  You don't seem to want to address that, but I'm not going to repeat it again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:42, 11 February 2010 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,622

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/753618"

Navigation menu