Changes

Do they dare to say this? Of course not. And they won't let any other conclusions be drawn from their hypothesis. Which is why opponents have branded evolution as [[pseudoscience]]. Pseudoscience, as I pointed out at Wikipedia, refuses to follow the 3nd & 4th steps of the four-part [[scientific method]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:42, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

Do they dare to say this? Of course not. And they won't let any other conclusions be drawn from their hypothesis. Which is why opponents have branded evolution as [[pseudoscience]]. Pseudoscience, as I pointed out at Wikipedia, refuses to follow the 3nd & 4th steps of the four-part [[scientific method]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:42, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

:Ed, we do see natural selection, antibiotic resistance in bacteria due to genetic mutation.  HIV mutation to allow for resistance to binding protein blockers.  Sickle cell anemia in locations of the world where malaria is prevalent.  Vestigial structures in animals and plants.  Should I go on?   

:Ed, we do see natural selection, antibiotic resistance in bacteria due to genetic mutation.  HIV mutation to allow for resistance to binding protein blockers.  Sickle cell anemia in locations of the world where malaria is prevalent.  Vestigial structures in animals and plants.  Should I go on?  --[[User:Tims|TimS]] 15:11, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

I agree with PalMD the peppered moth is over blown just because there are so much more to support TOE than a study performed before DNA was understood.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 14:52, 30 March 2007 (EDT)

I agree with PalMD the peppered moth is over blown just because there are so much more to support TOE than a study performed before DNA was understood.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 14:52, 30 March 2007 (EDT)