Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes removed ,  05:15, February 15, 2010
m
→‎1920s: removed extra comma // replaced > replace
Line 27: Line 27:  
    
 
    
 
===1920s===
 
===1920s===
−
As the war ended the king and his top advisers were deeply concerned about the republican threat to the British monarchy. They associated republicanism with the rise of socialism and the growing labour movement. Their concerns, although exaggerated, resulted in a redesign of the monarchy's social role to be more inclusive of the working class and its representatives--a dramatic change for George, who was most comfortable with naval officers and landed gentry. In fact the socialists no longer believed in their anti-monarchical slogans and were ready to come to terms with the monarchy if it took the first step. George took that step, adopting a more democratic stance that crossed class lines and bringing the monarchy closer to the public. The king also cultivated friendly relations with moderate Labour party politicians and trade union officials. George V's abandonment of social aloofness conditioned the royal family's behavior and enhanced its popularity during the economic crises of the 1920s and for over two generations thereafter.  Therefore in 1924 the king was willing, , in the absence of a clear majority for any one of the three parties, to  replaced Conservative Prime Minister [[Stanley Baldwin]] with [[Ramsay MacDonald]], the first Labour Party prime minister. King George's tactful and understanding reception of the first Labour government (which was short-lived) allayed the suspicions of the party's sympathizers throughout the nation.<ref> Frank Prochaska, "George V and Republicanism, 1917-1919." ''Twentieth Century British History'' 1999 10(1): 27-51. Issn: 0955-2359; Neville Kirk, "The Conditions of Royal Rule: Australian and British Socialist and Labour Attitudes to the Monarchy, 1901-11." ''Social History'' 2005 30(1): 64-88. Issn: 0307-1022 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]] </ref>
+
As the war ended the king and his top advisers were deeply concerned about the republican threat to the British monarchy. They associated republicanism with the rise of socialism and the growing labour movement. Their concerns, although exaggerated, resulted in a redesign of the monarchy's social role to be more inclusive of the working class and its representatives--a dramatic change for George, who was most comfortable with naval officers and landed gentry. In fact the socialists no longer believed in their anti-monarchical slogans and were ready to come to terms with the monarchy if it took the first step. George took that step, adopting a more democratic stance that crossed class lines and bringing the monarchy closer to the public. The king also cultivated friendly relations with moderate Labour party politicians and trade union officials. George V's abandonment of social aloofness conditioned the royal family's behavior and enhanced its popularity during the economic crises of the 1920s and for over two generations thereafter.  Therefore in 1924 the king was willing, in the absence of a clear majority for any one of the three parties, to  replace Conservative Prime Minister [[Stanley Baldwin]] with [[Ramsay MacDonald]], the first Labour Party prime minister. King George's tactful and understanding reception of the first Labour government (which was short-lived) allayed the suspicions of the party's sympathizers throughout the nation.<ref> Frank Prochaska, "George V and Republicanism, 1917-1919." ''Twentieth Century British History'' 1999 10(1): 27-51. Issn: 0955-2359; Neville Kirk, "The Conditions of Royal Rule: Australian and British Socialist and Labour Attitudes to the Monarchy, 1901-11." ''Social History'' 2005 30(1): 64-88. Issn: 0307-1022 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]] </ref>
    
Throughout the Coal Strike and the [[General Strike of 1926]], the king used every means in his power on the side of conciliation, to the conventional limits of a constitutional sovereign's function, which is "to advise, to encourage and to warn." He made another intervention during the economic crisis of 1931, when he carried on protracted negotiations with the party leaders and invited MacDonald to head a National (coalition) government. The general election of October 1931, not the formation of the first National Government in August 1931, determined the direction of politics during the 1930s. Between 1929 and the formation of the second National Government after the election, the Liberal Party had been a major participant in the political system, a position it lost when Liberal defectors coalesced with the dominant Conservatives during and after the election. The king played a crucial - and very active - role in the formation of both National Governments, and may have been a determining influence on Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald each time.<ref> See Vernon Bogdanor, "1931 Revisited: The Constitutional Aspects," ''Twentieth Century British History'' 1991 2(1): 1-25; he is disputed by Philip Williamson, "1931 Revisited: the Political Realities." ''Twentieth Century British History'' 1991 2(3): 328-338. </ref>
 
Throughout the Coal Strike and the [[General Strike of 1926]], the king used every means in his power on the side of conciliation, to the conventional limits of a constitutional sovereign's function, which is "to advise, to encourage and to warn." He made another intervention during the economic crisis of 1931, when he carried on protracted negotiations with the party leaders and invited MacDonald to head a National (coalition) government. The general election of October 1931, not the formation of the first National Government in August 1931, determined the direction of politics during the 1930s. Between 1929 and the formation of the second National Government after the election, the Liberal Party had been a major participant in the political system, a position it lost when Liberal defectors coalesced with the dominant Conservatives during and after the election. The king played a crucial - and very active - role in the formation of both National Governments, and may have been a determining influence on Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald each time.<ref> See Vernon Bogdanor, "1931 Revisited: The Constitutional Aspects," ''Twentieth Century British History'' 1991 2(1): 1-25; he is disputed by Philip Williamson, "1931 Revisited: the Political Realities." ''Twentieth Century British History'' 1991 2(3): 328-338. </ref>
Line 33: Line 33:  
King George's influence was always used on the side of moderation. The example he set, his sense of duty, his loyalty to those who served him, and his impartiality did much to inspire his ministers of all parties and to discourage party strategems. He was by temperament a cautious conservative who dimly understeed the revolutionary changes in the postwar world. But he had few vices and was earnestly devoted to his nation and Empire.  
 
King George's influence was always used on the side of moderation. The example he set, his sense of duty, his loyalty to those who served him, and his impartiality did much to inspire his ministers of all parties and to discourage party strategems. He was by temperament a cautious conservative who dimly understeed the revolutionary changes in the postwar world. But he had few vices and was earnestly devoted to his nation and Empire.  
   −
He was seriously ill in 1928 and 1929 and was in poor health thereafter, but he carried out his duties to the end. Radio was new and the king broadcast his Christmas radio messages to the Empire, starting in 1932; by their simplicity and friendliness, they had a wide appeal. In May 1935 he celebrated his silver jubilee amidst great expression of popular affection. He died on January 20, 1936.<ref> Francis Watson, "The Death of George V." ''History Today'' 1986 36(dec): 21-30. Issn: 0018-2753 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]</ref>  
+
He was seriously ill in 1928 and 1929 and was in poor health thereafter, but he carried out his duties to the end. Radio was new and the king broadcast his Christmas radio messages to the Empire, starting in 1932; by their simplicity and friendliness, they had a wide appeal. In May 1935 he celebrated his silver jubilee amidst great expression of popular affection. He died on January 20, 1936.<ref> Francis Watson, "The Death of George V." ''History Today'' 1986 36(dec): 21-30. Issn: 0018-2753 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]</ref>
    
==Bibliography==
 
==Bibliography==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
275

edits

Navigation menu