Automoderated users, edit
242
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 284:
Line 284: + +
Talk:Hollywood values (view source)
Revision as of 20:22, February 15, 2010
, 20:22, February 15, 2010→Hypocrisy - all specious
::: No, you overstate it. A better example would be if a [[conservative]] starred in a movie featuring sex and nudity. The howls of protest by [[liberals]] would be deafening!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:55, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
::: No, you overstate it. A better example would be if a [[conservative]] starred in a movie featuring sex and nudity. The howls of protest by [[liberals]] would be deafening!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:55, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
:::: That's an enormous overstatement, Aschlafly, and it's incorrect. Case in point: Sylvester Stallone in ''Party at Kitty and Stud's''[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0065904/], a soft-core pornography film, which includes group sex, "fellatio and light S&M." the only protests registered over that movie relate to how terrible it is. [[User:EMorris|EMorris]] 15:22, 15 February 2010 (EST)
::::But, [[Hollywood values]] embrassed by all [[Liberals]] would mean they were desensortised to this.
::::But, [[Hollywood values]] embrassed by all [[Liberals]] would mean they were desensortised to this.