21
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 161:
Line 161: + + + +
Talk:Liberal tricks (view source)
Revision as of 17:47, February 16, 2010
, 17:47, February 16, 2010→On the article itself: new section
::: I agree with the rhetoric used in accepting and promoting honorary degrees on a case by case basis varies based on the ideology of the person being awarded and the people who are not, but I meant that the idea behind the degrees is liberal. [[User:Marlowe|Marlowe]] 17:32, 5 July 2009 (EDT)
::: I agree with the rhetoric used in accepting and promoting honorary degrees on a case by case basis varies based on the ideology of the person being awarded and the people who are not, but I meant that the idea behind the degrees is liberal. [[User:Marlowe|Marlowe]] 17:32, 5 July 2009 (EDT)
== On the article itself ==
Is this strictly necessary? I honestly don't understand the point of including this list, it seems schoolyardish in it's list of flaws. Surely this isn't an encyclopedic entry?