Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, oversight, protect, rollback
1,839
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: − +
Heck, some of their liberal slander violates even the most liberal wikis' vandalism policies. Although 100% liberal trolling, it's not just on conservative wikis
* defacing wikis like [[Conservapedia]]<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&diff=752781&oldid=752780 Hate to highlight it, but as a reference...]</ref> and [[Wikipedia]]<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=33031414 A New York Times IP address vandalized George W. Bush's Wikipedia article. Aren't they mature?]</ref>
* defacing wikis like [[Conservapedia]]<ref>[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&diff=752781&oldid=752780 Hate to highlight it, but as a reference...]</ref> and [[Wikipedia]]<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=33031414 A New York Times IP address vandalized George W. Bush's Wikipedia article. Aren't they mature?]</ref>
==Pattern of liberal vandalism on conservative wikis==
==Pattern of liberal vandalism on wikis==
A typical liberal reads something they don't agree with. The liberal then decides to remove all content from the page or jokingly inserts parody/nonsense. Liberals understand that their edits will be removed to the original state and they will be blocked from further editing. This pattern repeats itself over and over like a compulsive disorder.
A typical liberal reads something they don't agree with. The liberal then decides to remove all content from the page or jokingly inserts parody/nonsense. Liberals understand that their edits will be removed to the original state and they will be blocked from further editing. This pattern repeats itself over and over like a compulsive disorder.