1,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + + +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools? (view source)
Revision as of 02:01, December 29, 2006
, 02:01, December 29, 2006no edit summary
Does it really do any good if American children learn to dismiss natural science? Do we really want to fall behind Europe and the rest of the world?
Does it really do any good if American children learn to dismiss natural science? Do we really want to fall behind Europe and the rest of the world?
: '''REPLY'''
: Creationism is not scientific? This is absolute nonsense. This is what evolutionists like to think, but it is the farthest thing from the truth. What can evolutionists bring up about creationism that is non-scientific? Also, what do you mean when you say that "[creationism] should only be studied in religious studies if we are to follow the Constitution."? Where exactly does the Constitution deny this right? [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 21:01, 28 December 2006 (EST)